In the second half of the 19th century, economic theorists conditionally divided all the states of the world into two modernization echelons, thereby determining their place in global material production. This classification still excites the minds of specialists in many countries who have embarked on the path of approximating public relations to world standards, set by the highest rates of technical development. True, now they count not three, but three echelons.
Leading first industrial train
The main indicator that determines what a modernization echelon is is the way the state develops, as well as the nature of the motivating factors that caused socio-economic reforms. Economic evolution contributed to the gradual adaptation of legislation to the needs of an emerging market, and the initiative was, figuratively speaking, “from below”.
Productive forces at some stage were not satisfied with existing legal norms, and there was a smooth departure from them in favor of new social relations, which inevitably entailed an improvement in the conditions for economic growth and stepwise, according to Hegel, “interrupted gradualness”. That is how the countries of the first echelon developed, which historically included the Western European states and the North American States.
In a simplified form, the situation in these countries can be represented as a constant request, turning into a demand from the active part of the population to the government: “Do not interfere with our development!”
The countries of the second tier of modernization
In the Russian Empire, Japan, Turkey, Spain, Portugal and some other countries at the turn of the XIX and XX centuries, the situation was somewhat different. Certain historical features of the development of these states led to a situation in which their industrial growth occurred with some (sometimes very conditional) lagging behind the leaders. Despite this, some indicators allowed them to maintain their leadership in many industries, for example, long-distance railways were quickly built in Russia, a huge amount of grain was grown, and production growth rates broke all records.
The second modernization echelon is countries striving to bridge the gap between their own industrial technologies and advanced levels. This process initiates government leadership, concerned about possible external threats and internal problems in the event of a further preservation or increase in the technological gap.
Simplified, this situation can be represented as an appeal by the head of the country to citizens: “Gentlemen, comrades, you need to do something, otherwise it will be bad. And I know what it is. ” Often, such modernization was carried out to strengthen the military potential necessary to unleash aggression and external expansion, but sometimes it also had a peaceful character.
Where did the third tier come from
In the mid-twentieth century, there were a number of states on the world map that seemed so technologically backward so that no one could have imagined possible prospects for their industrial development. Destroyed by Japanese aggression and the ensuing war of 1950-1953, South Korea made a rapid leap over several decades, becoming one of the leaders in world engineering. Taiwan, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Thailand and other Asian “young tigers” have also firmly established their position in the global market. At the end of the seventies, no one could have imagined that China would literally overwhelm its goods with shelves in all corners of the planet.
The third tier is the countries that have managed to turn their national problem, namely the low income level of the population, into a huge competitive advantage. Cheap labor has acted as an engine of progress. Modernization was carried out on the basis of borrowed technologies and comprehensive state support.
