Now, many people are faced with the problem of writing reviews. Especially often this need arises among students and researchers. Reviews are often confused with reviews. This is a big mistake, since these two forms of expression of opinion regarding any work have fundamental differences. Ignorance of these nuances is fraught with manifestation of ignorance and illiteracy on the part of the author. But it is worth noting that the review is not an essay on a free theme. It has a clear plan and should have a certain content. These and many other nuances of writing works in this genre will be discussed in the article.
What is a review?
The word "review" (recencio) from the Latin language is translated as "examination, examination." The term entrenched in literature at the turn of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
The review is considered as one of the genres of criticism in the literature. But despite its apparent uniqueness, it is divided into several main types.
The main types of reviews
1. A review can be written in the form of an essay. The author in this case describes his impression of the read book. But such a syllable cannot be a review of a scientific article. An example is a review of some kind of literary work. An essay is most often written in the form of lyrical reflection.
2. A journalistic or critical article of a small size may also be presented as a review of the article. An example of such work can be found in scientific journals, which discuss current literary and social problems.
3. Another type of this genre is auto review. In this case, the author himself describes the brief meaning of his work. The author can supplement the auto review with comments regarding the information contained in the main part of the work.
4. A detailed annotation is most often used as a review of an article. An example of such a form must necessarily contain information about the meaning of the work, the features of writing, as well as about the main advantages and disadvantages of the work.
5. The last type of this genre is an examination review, which is written by a student to assess their degree of understanding of any work. This may be a review of the article. An example of writing can be found in the textbook.
Since the review is a scientific or literary work, it must contain certain parts.
What should include a review
1. A detailed description of the subject of analysis. Be sure to indicate the genre, author and basic characteristics of the work, such as style, volume and analysis methods used (if we are talking about a scientific article).
2. The reviewer must justify the relevance of the topic on which the work is written.
3. The review indicates the main idea of this work. That is, what exactly the author wanted to say in his work.
4. The review must necessarily contain a brief description of the work. The reviewer is obliged to give a general description of the work with an indication of its key points.
5. Deficiencies should also be noted in the review of the article. Example: insufficient number of sources of information or use of irrelevant data, etc.
6. And at the end of the review, it is imperative to draw conclusions. They should be concise and unambiguous. The findings should contain information on the scientific or artistic value of the work.
What is the difference between a review and a review
Very often, a review is confused with a review. But this is wrong, because these two genres have significant differences. The review must necessarily contain all the above points. While recall is only a short description of the work without a detailed analysis. Reviews are much more common than reviewing an article. A review example is a short description that appears at the end or beginning of any book. Its purpose is only to highlight the main idea of the work and its brief description.
