Want to become an interesting conversationalist? Then you need to have in stock several universal topics that you can talk to any person. But not always your opponent will agree to support the conversation. What to do in this case? Below you will find topics for discussion that will help revitalize any conversation, make it memorable and interesting.
Can animals be used in medical research?
Think about your experiences? Do you think mice and monkeys die in vain? Animal experiments are an interesting topic of debate. It is difficult to find people who hold the same opinion. Your environment can be divided into two camps. Those people who believe that experiments are needed can make very bold arguments. For example, if you prohibit testing drugs on animals, will people suffer from this? Most likely, yes, because then scientists will look for people on whom they can verify the effectiveness of the studied drugs. Of course, I will pay these people, but they are more likely that they will die as a result of the experiments. Animal advocates can argue that our younger brothers are not slaves. They must independently manage their own lives. No one asks the mouse for permission to give her an injection. A person who has provided his body for experiments will know for sure about all the consequences of injections and pills.
Is marriage a relic of the past?
Are you married? Married? No? Is it worth it in the modern world to enter into formal marriages? This topic is controversial. Many young people sincerely believe that civil marriage is no different from official marriage. The stamp in the passport for them is a simple formality, and the wedding is a relic of the past. Children need to be raised in a normal atmosphere and so that they have both parents. Parents are painted or not, it does not matter for the child. But opponents of this opinion argue that a marriage that is not officially registered is more likely to break up. People do not take cohabitation seriously, they always have the opportunity to disperse. Moreover, such scenes of separation, and then a truce in some families who live in a civil marriage, happen almost every week.
It is clear that this topic should not be raised on the first date, but spending an evening discussing with a good friend or girlfriend will be very interesting.
Death Penalty: Acceptable or Not?
Probably, each person thought about the moratorium, which was introduced in our country since 1997. But the introduction or abolition of the death penalty can be a fruitful topic for debate. Some people are of the opinion that all criminals, thieves and killers do not deserve life. Unworthy people simply should not exist on our earth. Yes, of course, now they are in prison, but you can escape them. All the more so since there are honest citizens who are made at the expense of taxes and work from morning till night, earning their living. Yes, the prisoners also came up with work - they build roads and are involved in the mining industry, but still there is little benefit from their work. One could find those who want to receive money for what the "convicts" do for free.
Opponents of the death penalty sincerely believe that its introduction will adversely affect people. After all, many innocent people are in prison. Some of them were framed, some were sent to prison, not understanding who was right and who was to blame. To destroy all these people will be simply inhuman.
Will cloning benefit or harm humanity?
A heated debate on a scientific topic can be invented by reading one of the fantastic books. How do you feel about cloning? Do you think that the future lies with him or are you afraid that an army of artificially created people will be able to fill the world? A public debate on a scientific topic can attract increased attention to your person. But in order not to fall into the dirt with your face, you must think through the arguments for your position in advance. If you decide that cloning is a breakthrough in the field of science, then you can say that thanks to clones, people will live longer. After all, if a person fails, for example, a kidney, it can be easily transplanted from a cloned human body. Clones can also do the work that people don’t want to do. The opposite opinion is based on what he considers the product of a technical breakthrough - sane individuals. If we consider that clones are people who must live a full life, then it will be unfair to kill them because someone sharply needed their organ.
Is the man himself a blacksmith of happiness or is fate to blame?
Do not want to start a debate on a scientific topic? Then you can talk about something mystical. For example, about whether to believe in fate. There are two opposing opinions. Representatives of one group argue that fate is what is destined for a person before birth and it is impossible to change its course. This statement is based on scripture. Each of the educated people heard the phrase: "The ways of the Lord are mysterious." But should she be believed? Representatives of another group argue that a person can go his life's journey along the path he chooses. For example, an engineer can become an alcoholic, and an alcoholic who will undergo rehabilitation can head one of the large companies. A person can manage what he has and can achieve what he wants. Ask your friends what their opinions on this matter are.
