IN AND. Lenin more than a hundred years ago said: "Politics is a concentrated expression of the economy." This formula has been proven by time. The main task of any government is to create a developed economy. Without it, it will not be able to maintain power. What is a policy? This is an area of action between states, peoples, classes, social groups. Economic relations in any of these areas are fundamental.
Political organization of society
How can one explain the expression that politics is a concentrated expression of the economy? Any organized society does not exist simply as a group of people. It has its own structure. This applies to his political organization. It consists of a system of institutions, the main of which is the state, as well as political parties, organizations, institutions. As a result of the historical development of society, the emergence of classes and states, the formation of a political system takes place.
It depends on many factors, but more on the structure of society and the class struggle. The sharper the latter, the greater the number of issues that are involved in the political system. Politics is divided into internal and external. They solve different issues, but at the same time they are aimed at solving one problem: preservation and strengthening of the state system of society. Politics is based on the economy, being its superstructure. The more thoroughly this foundation, the firmer the position of the state. So, is politics a concentrated expression of the economy? Let's get it right.
Society structure
From the point of view of sociology, society consists of many historically established ties, systems and institutions that operate on a single territory. The structure of society is complex. It consists of:
- A large number of people, citizens who are united among themselves according to several principles. At the place of residence: cities, towns, villages and so on. At the place of work: any enterprises, state institutions. At the place of study: universities, institutes, colleges, schools.
- Many social statuses. Citizens, heads of enterprises and organizations, deputies of various levels, political and public figures and so on.
- State and social norms and values that determine the specific activities of people, systems and institutions.
Despite the complex structure, society, from the point of view of sociology, is a single, but not without contradictions, organism. It has its own social structure. These are stable and balanced relations that are determined by the relations of classes and other social groups, the division of labor, and the characteristics of institutions.
The main characteristic of society is the relative unity of the productive forces and administrative structures. Between them, certain economic, political and legal relations take shape, between which there are mutual relations and actions.
Politics or economics
Until our time, the debate, which is primary, politics or economics, has not subsided. Politics defines economics or vice versa. Therefore, the expression of Lenin is constantly disputed: "Politics is a concentrated expression of the economy." These two factors are inextricably linked. But the history of the last century does not know examples of the opposite. A state with a weak economy cannot pursue its independent foreign and domestic policy. It depends on economically developed countries, which today determine the most important issues of world politics.
Backward countries in the economic development of the country practically do not participate in this. There is a claim that the economy is the basis for politics. This definition was put forward and justified by K. Marx in Capital. He argued that the political superstructure of any state is based on the economic structure of society. This is the law, and the whole history of the development of mankind can serve as proof of this.
Politics is a concentrated expression of the economy
Who said this, making this phrase defining? This thesis V.I. Lenin formulated leading a discussion on trade unions with L. Trotsky and N. Bukharin. According to him, politics has no superiority over the economy. Attempts to even equate them may be erroneous. This can be traced throughout the history of human society. It should be borne in mind that the economic basis, being the basis of the structure of society, contains not only political, but also other add-ons.
Policy Purpose
Based on long-term factors, it should provide real conditions for the development of the economy. Without a solid foundation, its add-ons cannot be effective. Politics primarily reflects the economy. This confirms that politics is a concentrated expression of the economy. The solution of its questions and problems is, first of all, necessary for the preservation and strengthening of political power. But at the same time, the logic of politics cannot always correspond to the logic of economics.
In a sense, politics has a great degree of independence, trying to solve not only economic, but also other issues important to the state. But this is not at all easy to do without a strong economic foundation. There is no strong political power without the support of the people. He will always support the government that provides his basic needs. And this, first of all, is a well-paid work that provides the necessary benefits - decent housing, medical care, education, pensions and much more. All this is guaranteed only by an economically developed state.
Politics and Economics in the Age of Globalization
What explanation can be given to politics as a concentrated expression of the economy in the age of globalization? To do this, at first glance, is quite difficult. Historically, the development of civilizations in the world is uneven. It is globalization that accelerates this process. This can be seen in developing countries, where the growth of material inequality has become more significant. With the visible growth of the economy, its growing indicators, these countries remain politically dependent. This is understandable, since corporations that invested in the construction of enterprises owned by transcontinental companies do not intend to develop foreign states and economies.
The lion's share of income goes to them. The remaining percentages are divided between the powers that be, senior management managers, and the crumbs go to the workers. The rest of the population is given the right to contemplate from the shacks surrounding ultra-modern megacities, the splendor of palaces, expensive cars, and everything else that the above-mentioned parts of the population can afford. Can one expect an independent policy from these economically dependent states? Of course not.
Economic component
The development of civilization has now reached such a level that the leading position in the world is occupied not by those countries where there are more factories. This position is occupied by states that own advanced technologies. This is what allows them to dictate their conditions in politics. Giant production is usually built in countries that belong to the third world. If we assume that politics is a concentrated expression of the economy, it can be argued that states that do not have a strong and solid basis cannot have advanced technologies.
Possessing technology, developed countries dictate their conditions, well aware that without this component there will be no movement forward. Currently, a small number of countries, such as Germany, China, and the USA, constitute economic dominance. It is these countries that conduct active foreign policy activities, trying to dictate the political conditions that they need, widely defending their benefits.
Independent policy
Is it possible for countries with undeveloped economies to pursue an independent independent policy that provides great opportunities for progressive impacts on the development of the state and on the historical process at present? Today there are no such precedents in the world. In modern history, there are attempts to defend their interests, declaring their independence, but they all ended in failure.
This can be seen in the example of Iraq, where bombardment was used, followed by military intervention. US Appointment of Venezuelan President. Can someone object? Only China and Russia. These examples, alas, are not single. Or the construction of the Nord Stream. Where is the independent policy of developed Germany here?
