philosophy

Philosopher Rozanov: biography, scientific papers, publications

Table of contents:

Philosopher Rozanov: biography, scientific papers, publications
Philosopher Rozanov: biography, scientific papers, publications

Video: 5 tips to improve your critical thinking - Samantha Agoos 2024, July

Video: 5 tips to improve your critical thinking - Samantha Agoos 2024, July
Anonim

The life path of the philosopher Vasily Vasilyevich Rozanov covers the period from 1856 to 1919. He became a well-known literary critic, publicist. He left behind a kind of artistic heritage that allows you to immerse yourself in the era of the Silver Age. From a brief biography of Vasily Rozanov, you can find out that he managed to create his own literary genre over the years of his life, they began to imitate him en masse. In addition, his personality remains largely shrouded in mystery, and after a whole century. Even despite the fact that the biography of Vasily Rozanov was repeatedly described, and whole volumes are devoted to his teachings.

Biography

His native city is Vetluga in the Kostroma province. He was born into a bureaucratic family, he had many brothers and sisters. The future writer Vasily Rozanov early lost both parents. In fact, his older brother Nikolai took up his education. Since 1870, they moved to Simbirsk, where his young trustee became a teacher at the gymnasium. Describing his life (years 1856-1919), the Russian philosopher V. Rozanov notes that if not for his brother, he would simply not have survived. Nikolay managed to graduate from the university in Kazan by the time his parents died, he provided Vasily with all the conditions for receiving an education, and in fact replaced his father.

Image

In Simbirsk, a potential writer was a regular visitor to the Karamzin library. In 1872, he changed his place of residence to Nizhny Novgorod, where he entered a gymnasium and in 1878 had already completed his studies.

After graduation, he entered Moscow University. There he attended lectures by Solovyov, Klyuchevsky, Korsh and many others. By the fourth year, the future philosopher Vasily Rozanov received a Khomyakov scholarship. In 1880, he married A.P. Suslova, who was 41 years old. Until that moment, she was the mistress of the family F. Dostoevsky.

After university

At the end of a higher educational institution in 1882, he decided not to get a master's degree, but went into free creativity. In the next 11 years, the Russian philosopher Rozanov worked as a teacher in the gymnasiums of several cities: Simbirsk, Vyazma, Yelets, Bryansk, Bely. He published the first book in 1886. In it, he attempted to explain science by Hegelian methods, but it was not successful. Soon after the publication and failure of the work of Vasily Rozanov, Suslov left. She refused to formalize a divorce

He became famous after the publication of the sketch “The Legend of the Grand Inquisitor F. M. Dostoevsky”. This work appeared in 1891, it laid the foundation for a new interpretation of the works of the Russian thinker as works of a religious nature. Later, as a writer and philosopher, Rozanov became close to Berdyaev and Bulgakov, other philosopher-theologians.

In 1900, he, together with his comrades, founded the Religious and Philosophical Society. He becomes the most famous Slavophile journalist in Russia. His articles are published in the newspaper "New time", as well as in a number of magazines.

Second marriage

In 1891, he made a secret wedding with VD Butyagina, she was the widow of a gymnasium teacher in Yelets. At this stage of his biography, the philosopher Rozanov himself taught there. Together with Pervovy, he makes the first Russian translation from Greek of Metaphysics by Aristotle.

In addition, he fiercely opposes the education system in the Russian Empire, indicating his position very clearly in articles on this topic. He described with sympathy the Russian revolution of 1905-1907. Then came the book of Vasily Rozanov “When the bosses left.”

In individual works, he was engaged in the search for ways to solve problems that arose in religiosity and society. The books of Vasily Rozanov “Religion and Culture” (1899) and “Nature and History” (1900) are devoted to this.

Image

He was very controversial about the Orthodox Church. He carefully considered the problems of family and sex in the country. This is the subject of the book by Vasily Rozanov, “The Family Question in Russia, ” published in 1903. In the course of his writings, he finally disagrees with Christianity on the issue of gender. He contrasted the Old Testament with the New. The first he proclaimed as a statement of the life of the flesh.

Break with society

After the publication of some articles on the subject of the Beilis in 1911, he began to conflict with the Religious and Philosophical Society, of which he himself was a member. The rest considered the Beilis case an insult to the Russians, and the philosopher Vasily Rozanov was urged to leave their ranks. He did so.

His later books were collections of essays on various topics. The philosophy of Vasily Vasilievich Rozanov slipped briefly in them. They were united by mood and contained many internal dialogues. Researchers note that at that time the writer was in a spiritual crisis. He became pessimistic, this is fully reflected in the "Apocalypse of our time" 1917-1918. At the same time, he was aware of the inevitability of a catastrophe in the country, of revolutionary events. This period of Vasily Rozanov’s biography was marked for him by collapse, since he associated the revolution of Russia with such a concept. In 1917, he wrote that there was no Tsar — ​​and for him, there was no Russia.

His writings were actively criticized by the Marxist revolutionaries. Also, liberals and representatives of the Russian intelligentsia did not accept it.

In Sergiev Posad

In the summer months of 1917, Vasily Rozanov moved from Petrograd to Sergiev Posad. There he settles in the house of the teacher of the local theological seminary. On the last pages of the biography of Vasily Rozanov, there remains an openly impoverished person who lived in hunger. In 1918, he wrote an appeal in the Apocalypse, where he asked for cash assistance. Glorified thanks to his philosophy, Vasily Vasilyevich Rozanov was already on the edge of the abyss, admitted that he could not have survived that last year without help. In February 1919, he dies.

Vasily Rozanov had 5 children - 4 girls and one boy. His daughter, born in 1900, Nadezhda Vasilyevna, becomes an artist and illustrator.

Philosophy

In short, the philosophy of Vasily Rozanov was evaluated very controversially. The thing is that he gravitated to extremes. It was deliberate. That was his striking feature. He believed that "it is necessary to have exactly a thousand points of view on the subject."

Image

This idea expressed a peculiar specificity of the philosophy of Vasily Vasilyevich Rozanov. He looked at the world with an unusual look. So, he believed that the events of the revolution of 1905-1907 should be considered from different angles. He simultaneously published articles from completely different positions - under his last name he acted as a monarchist, while under the pseudonym V. Varvarin he defended a populist point of view.

For the philosopher Rozanov, the spiritual homeland was in Simbirsk. He wrote in great detail about his youth in this area. His whole life was built on 3 foundations - Kostroma, Simbirsk and Yelets, which were, respectively, its physical, spiritual and moral centers. In literary art, the philosopher Rozanov manifested himself as an already established person. His long journey in this form of creativity was not interrupted, in it there was a gradual development of talent and the discovery of genius. The philosopher Rozanov regularly changed the theme of his own works, a look at the problems, but the personality of the Creator always remained elevated in them.

His living conditions were in many ways no easier than that of Maxim Gorky. He was brought up in the spirit of nihilism and passionately wanted to serve society. He was guided by this, choosing the path of a public figure of a democratic nature. He could express social protest, but in his youth there was a rather strong coup. After that, he sought his historical homeland in other regions, becoming a commentator. Almost all of his works are a look at the events surrounding him.

Egocentrism

Researchers of his works notice the self-centered orientation of the philosopher. Many of his critics met his initial editions with bewilderment. Positive reviews of the first works of Rozanov simply did not work. Everyone gave him a frantic, furious rebuff. Rozanov declared in the pages of his works: "I am not yet such a scoundrel to think about morality."

He was a Russian writer who managed to know the honor and love of his readers. This was manifested in the reviews of his fans, who were written intimately, in separate letters.

Philosophy

The philosophy of Vasily Rozanov differs in atypical features, despite the fact that it is included in the general Russian philosophical circle. The thinker himself was at the epicenter of the events raging at the beginning of the 20th century in the Russian Empire. He actively communicated with many writers, artists. Many of his works expressed an ideological, substantial reaction to the phenomena he noticed. He criticized the opinion of Berdyaev, Solovyov, Blok and many others.

Image

Most of all, Vasily Rozanov was worried about the problems of morality and ethics, religiosity and the opposition. He often talked about the apology of the family. In his works, he tried to get rid of contradictions.

Interpreting Rozanov's philosophy, someone proclaimed that this was the reasoning of the "little religious man." Indeed, he very actively investigated the internal dialogues of such a person with theology, he emphasized the complexity of these issues.

The scope of the tasks considered by Rozanov is only partly related to the church. It does not lend itself to critical evaluation. A man is alone, bypassing external institutions that unite people, creating for them some common tasks.

He regards religion as a meeting, a public association. While clarifying personal spiritual issues leads to controversy. A man tries to find his methods, to connect and unite with others, expecting that then everything will fall into place.

Journalism

Researchers at Vasily Rozanov’s activities note that his articles are written in an unusual genre. They could hardly be identified to any particular style. At the same time, it was a stable part of his work. He constantly reacted to the spite of the day. The philosopher produces desktop books. In his writings, he tries to reproduce "understanding" in all the diverse complexities of the living facial expressions of oral speech. It was this genre that was entrenched in him, his works always gravitated to experiences. He finally took shape to the last work.

Religion in creativity

Vasily Rozanov himself said about himself that he "forever poses himself." He noted that everything he writes about ultimately dates back to God one way or another. He believed that while the whole religion of the world is individual, Christianity has become personal. The philosopher gives everyone the right to decide, but not what confession to profess, this has already been decided once, but the question of rooting the individual in the common faith.

He believed that the churching could not be done only through the rites of the sacrament. A sincere conviction is needed, a belief that everything in his life is now marked by a touch of religiosity.

He considers the relation to God and to the church through the prism of the concept of conscience. It is to this feeling that he assigns the role of the separator to the personality on the subjective and objective component. He distinguishes two aspects in the matter of conscience - her attitude towards God and her attitude towards the church.

God, from his point of view, is a Personal infinite spirit.

Gender theme

Nevertheless, the theme of gender became a central issue in all his work. In 1898, he formulated his own definition of this aspect. He pointed out that this is not an organ, not a function, but a determinant person. Sex is real and remains a mystery just as the mind does not comprehend the meaning of being. The man in his metaphysics, who is one in soul and body, is associated with the Logos. However, communication is exposed precisely in the intimate realm of being: in the sphere of sexual love.

Jewish theme

Vasily Rozanov very actively raised the Jewish question in his work. The thing is his special view of the world, filled with mystical and religious features. He claimed the sanctity of marriage, procreation. Basil opposed the denial of the flesh, asceticism and celibacy. He cited how the floor, family, and conception were sanctified in the Old Testament, contrasting it with the New Testament, like the life of death.

It was an anti-Christian riot. Soon, he switched to organic conservatism, filled with love for everyday confession, the family. From here came anti-Semitism, which was traced in his work and outraged a wide part of the audience. Some of his statements were overtly anti-Semitic. But it is important to consider that it was typical for the philosopher to go to extremes - this was a striking feature of his thinking, which made him interesting and remarkable. He did many things deliberately. He was both anti-Semite and anti-Semite at the same moment.

Image

However, Rozanov himself denied anti-Semitism in his own works. When the sensational case of Beilis was considered, Vasily began publishing numerous articles. And according to the Jewish encyclopedia, in them he justified the accusation of Jews in ritual murder, proving that the basis of their cult consists in bloodshed.

Because of the duality of completely opposite views, Rozanov was actively accused of unprincipledness. It was for these articles, which contained an enthusiastic anthem to the Jews and the preaching of anti-Semitism, that he left the Religious and Philosophical Society in 1913.

Only closer to the end of his earthly journey, Rozanov stopped expressing open hostility towards the Jews, sometimes speaking with enthusiasm about them. In the last book, he praised the works of Moses, and also wrote the lines: “Live, Jews. I bless you in everything … ”